| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
* From the Departments of Anesthesia,
Radiology, and
Cardiology, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Stephen E. Kowalski, Department of Anesthesia, University of Manitoba, Room LB315, Lennox Bell Lodge, 60 Pearl Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 1X2, Canada. E-mail: sekowalski{at}exchange.hsc.mb.ca
Purpose: Pulmonary dysfunction commonly occurs following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, increasing morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) would improve pulmonary function and would decrease complications in patients undergoing CABG surgery.
Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted with Ethics Board approval. Fifty patients, undergoing CABG surgery, were randomized to the epidural group or to the patient-controlled analgesia morphine group. Patients in the epidural group received a high, thoracic epidural, preoperatively. Intraoperatively, 0.75% ropivacaine was infused, followed postoperatively, by 0.2% ropivacaine for 48 hr. Outcome measurements included: visual analogue pain scores; spirometry; atelectasis scores on chest radiographs; and the incidence of atrial fibrillation.
Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled in each group. Patients in the epidural group had significantly less pain on the operative day, and for the subsequent two days. Compared to baseline, the forced expiratory volume in one second was significantly higher in the epidural group, on the first and second postoperative days (43.7 ± 12.2% vs 36.4 ± 12.0%, p < 0.002, and 43.3 ± 12.5% vs 38.4 ± 11.0%, p <0.05). There was significantly more atelectasis in the control group, four hours postoperatively (p < 0.04); however, on the third, postoperative day, the groups were similar with regards to this outcome. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was similar in both groups, and there were no complications related to the epidural.
Conclusions: High TEA decreases postoperative pain and atelectasis and improves pulmonary function in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Our results support the use of TEA in this group of patients.
1 Gravlee GP. Epidural analgesia and coronary artery bypass grafting: the controversy continues. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17: 151–3.[Medline]
2 Chaney MA. Intrathecal and epidural anesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1211–21.[Medline]
3 Scott NB, Turfrey DJ, Ray DA, et al. A prospective randomized study of the potential benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 528–35.
4 Sternest R, Bjella L, Berg EM, Christensen O, Levang OW, Gisvold SE. Effects of thoracic epidural analgesia on pulmonary function after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10: 859–65.[Abstract]
5 Priestley M, Cope, L, Halliwell R, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: the effects on tracheal intubation time and length of hospital stay. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 275–82.
6 Fawcett WJ, Edwards RE, Quinn IA, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia started after cardiopulmonary bypass. Adrenergic, cardiovascular and respiratory sequelae. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 294–9.[Medline]
7 Tenling A, Joachimsson PO, Tyden H, Hedenstierna G. Thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia for cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 1071–6.[Medline]
8 Jideus L, Joachimsson PO, Stridsberg M, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia does not influence the occurrence of postoperative sustained atrial fibrillation. Am Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 65–71.
9 Wilcox P, Baile EM, Hards J, et al. Phrenic nerve function and its relationship to atelectasis after coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 1988; 93: 693–8.[Medline]
10 Ballantyne JC, Carr, DB, deFerranti S, et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 598–612.[Abstract]
11 Nicholson DJ, Kowalski SE, Hamilton GA, Meyers MP, Serrette CA, Duke PC. Postoperative pulmonary function in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients undergoing early tracheal extubation: a comparison between short-term mechanical ventilation and early extubation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 27–31.[Medline]
12 Liu SS, Block BM, Wu CL. Effects of periorperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. A meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2004, 101: 153–61.[Medline]
13 Weissman C. Pulmonary function after cardiac and thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1272–9.
14 Liem TH, Hasenbos MA, Booij LH, Gielen MJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting using two different anesthetic techniques: Part 2: postoperative outcome. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1992; 6: 156–61.[Medline]
15 Moon MC, Abdoh A, Hamilton GA, et al. Safety and efficacy of fast track in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 2001; 16: 319–26.[Medline]
16 Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor LC, et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA 2004; 291: 1720–9.
17 Ho AM, Chung DC, Joynt GM. Neuroaxial blockade and hematoma in cardiac surgery : estimating the risk of a rare adverse event that has not (yet) occurred. Chest 2000; 117: 551–5.[Medline]
18 Pastor MC, Sanchez MJ, Casas MA, Mateu J, Bataller ML. Thoracic epidural analgesia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: seven years’ experience. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17: 154–9.[Medline]
19 Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Benzon H, et al. Regional anesthesia in the anti-coagulated patient: defining the risks (The Second ASRA Consensus Conference on Neuraxial Anesthesia and Anticoagulation). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 172–97.[Medline]
20 Rosen DA, Hawkinberry II DW, Rosen KR, Gustafson RA, Hogg JP, Broadman LM. An epidural hematoma in an adolescent patient after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 966–9.
21 Vandermeulen EP, Van Aken H, Vermylen J. Anticoagulants and spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 1165–77.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
