| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
* From the Second Department of Anesthesiology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo; and the
Department of Anesthesia, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Toshiya Shiga, Second Department of Anesthesiology, Toho University School of Medicine, Ohashi 2-17-6, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan. Phone: +81-3-3468-1251; Fax: +81-3-3481-7336; E-mail: qzx02115{at}nifty.com
Purpose: Mortality associated with hip fracture is high in elderly patients. Surgical repair within 24 hr after admission is recommended by The Royal College of Physicians’ guidelines; however, the effect of operative delay on mortality remains controversial. The objective of this study was to determine whether operative delay increases mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture.
Methods: Published English-language reports examining the effect of surgical delay on mortality in patients who underwent hip surgery were identified from electronic databases. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality at 30 days and at one year. Effect sizes with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated by using a DerSimonian-Laird randomeffects model.
Results: Sixteen prospective or retrospective observational studies (257,367 patients) on surgical timing and mortality in hip fracture patients were selected. When a cut-off of 48 hr from the time of admission was used to define operative delay, the odds ratio for 30-day mortality was 1.41 (95% CI = 1.29–1.54, P < 0.001), and that for one-year mortality was 1.32 (95% CI = 1.21–1.43, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: In hip fracture patients, operative delay beyond 48 hr after admission may increase the odds of 30-day all-cause mortality by 41% and of one-year all-cause mortality by 32%. Potential residual confounding factors in observational studies may limit definitive conclusions. Although routine surgery within 48 hr after admission is hard to achieve in most facilities, anesthesiologists must be aware that an undue delay may be harmful to hip fracture patients, especially those at relatively low risk or those who are young.
1 Hip Fractures Among Older Adults. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Available from URL; http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/adulthipfx.htm (cited 2007 May 12).
2 Parker M, Johansen A. Hip fracture. BMJ 2006; 333: 27–30.
3 Morrison RS, Chassin MR, Siu AL. The medical consultant’s role in caring for patients with hip fracture. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 1010–20.
4 Lyons AR. Clinical outcomes and treatment of hip fractures. Am J Med 1997; 103: 51S–63S.[Medline]
5 Bottle A, Aylin P. Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study. BMJ 2006; 332: 947–51.
6 Majumdar SR, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW, Dick DA, Cinats JG, Jiang HX. Lack of association between mortality and timing of surgical fixation in elderly patients with hip fracture: results of a retrospective population-based cohort study. Med Care 2006; 44: 552–9.[Medline]
7 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008–12.
8 Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 377–84.[Abstract]
9 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177–88.[Medline]
10 Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995; 310: 452–4.
11 Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research, 1st ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2000.
12 Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50: 1088–101.[Medline]
13 Parker MJ, Pryor GA. The timing of surgery for proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74: 203–5.[Medline]
14 Zuckerman JD, Skovron ML, Koval KJ, Aharonoff G, Frankel VH. Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1551–6.
15 Elliott J, Beringer T, Kee F, Marsh D, Willis C, Stevenson M. Predicting survival after treatment for fracture of the proximal femur and the effect of delays to surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 788–95.[Medline]
16 Moran CG, Wenn RT, Sikand M, Taylor AM. Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 483–9.
17 Siegmeth AW, Gurusamy K, Parker MJ. Delay to surgery prolongs hospital stay in patients with fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 1123–6.[Medline]
18 Stoddart J, Horne G, Devane P. Influence of preoperative medical status and delay to surgery on death following a hip fracture. ANZ J Surg 2002; 72: 405–7.[Medline]
19 Grimes JP, Gregory PM, Noveck H, Butler MS, Carson JL. The effects of time-to-surgery on mortality and morbidity in patients following hip fracture. Am J Med 2002; 112: 702–9.[Medline]
20 Gdalevich M, Cohen D, Yosef D, Tauber C. Morbidity and mortality after hip fracture: the impact of operative delay. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 334–40.[Medline]
21 McGuire KJ, Bernstein J, Polsky D, Silber JH. The 2004 Marshall Urist award: delays until surgery after hip fracture increases mortality. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 428: 294–301.[Medline]
22 Franzo A, Francescutti C, Simon G. Risk factors correlated with post-operative mortality for hip fracture surgery in the elderly: a population-based approach. Eur J Epidemiol 2005; 20: 985–91.[Medline]
23 Weller I, Wai EK, Jaglal S, Kreder HJ. The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 361–6.[Medline]
24 Bergeron E, Lavoie A, Moore L, et al. Is the delay to surgery for isolated hip fracture predictive of outcome in efficient systems? J Trauma 2006; 60: 753–7.[Medline]
25 Sund R, Liski A. Quality effects of operative delay on mortality in hip fracture treatment. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 371–7.
26 Novack V, Jotkowitz A, Etzion O, Porath A. Does delay in surgery after hip fracture lead to worse outcomes? A multicenter survey. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 170–6.
27 Orosz GM, Hannan EL, Magaziner J, et al. Hip fracture in the older patient: reasons for delay in hospitalization and timing of surgical repair. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1336–40.[Medline]
28 Egger M, Smith GD, Shneider M. Systematic reviews of observational studies. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (Eds). Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Metaanalysis in Context, 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2001: 211–27.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
