CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toyota, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsukawa, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toyota, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsukawa, T.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 48:854-858 (2001)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2001

General Anesthesia

IM droperidol as premedication attenuates intraoperative hypothermia

[L'administration im d'une prémédication de dropéridol atténue l'hypothermie peropératoire]

Kousaku Toyota, Md*, Shinichi Sakura, Md*, Yoji Saito, Md*, Akemi Shido, Md* and Takashi Matsukawa, Md{dagger}

* From the Department of Anesthesiology, Shimane Medical University, Izumo City, and the
{dagger} Department of Anesthesiology,Yamanashi Medical University, Yamanashi, Japan.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Shinichi Sakura, Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Shimane Medical University, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo City, 693-8501 Japan. Phone: 81-853-20-2295; Fax: 81-853-20-2292; E-mail; ssakura{at}shimane-med.ac.jp

Purpose: Perioperative hypothermia results largely from core-to-peripheral heat redistribution. Droperidol, which is often used for premedication, promotes vasodilation, and thus may affect redistribution of heat. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that preanesthetic droperidol would affect perioperative hypothermia.

Methods: Twenty-three ASA physical status I patients scheduled for arthroscopic ligament reconstruction were randomly assigned to two groups to receive no premedication or im droperidol 0.1 mg•kg–1 30 min before anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and fentanyl. We monitored core (tympanic) and peripheral (palm) temperatures, and skin (fingertip) blood flow for two hours after the induction of anesthesia during surgery.

Results: Before the induction of anesthesia, patients given droperidol were more deeply sedated than those given no premedication. Core temperature, which was similar in both groups before induction, decreased significantly more in the control than in the droperidol patients (0.75 ± 0.34°C and 0.37 ± 0.20°C, respectively, at 75 min after induction; P <0.01). Preinduction peripheral temperature and skin blood flow were lower in the control group than in the droperidol group, but the two variables became similar in both groups after induction.

Conclusion: The results of the present study confirm our hypothesis that premedication with droperidol affects perioperative hypothermia. Droperidol may prevent core-to-peripheral heat redistribution after the induction of anesthesia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.