| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


* From the Departments of Dentistry and Oral Surgery and
Anesthesiology, University of Hirosaki School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan, and
University Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK.
Address correspondence to: Dr. K. Hirota, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hirosaki School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan. Phone: +81-172-39-5111; Fax: +81-172-39-5112; E-mail: masuika{at}cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp
Purpose: To examine whether lidocaine diffusion across an endotracheal tube cuff affects tracheostomy tube discomfort.
Methods: Two tracheostomy tube cuffs were inflated with 5 ml lidocaine 4% solution and air at 20 cmH2O, and then placed in 20 ml distilled water at 37°C. After vigorous stirring, 100 µl of this water was then sampled immediately then 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 hr later to measure lidocaine concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography. Sixteen patients undergoing tracheostomy following oral cancer resection were randomly assigned to two groups: lidocaine (n=8) and placebo (n=8). A tracheostomy tube cuff was inflated with 5 ml lidocaine 4% or saline 0.9% and air to a cuff pressure of 20 cmH2O, in the lidocaine and placebo groups respectively. Tube discomfort was evaluated using a visual analogue scale at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hr after lidocaine or saline administration. Neither analgesics nor sedatives was given during the evaluation period.
Results: Lidocaine time-dependently diffused across the tracheostomy tube cuff. Thirty and 60 min after cuff inflation lidocaine concentrations in the water bath reached approximately 8 and 17 µgml1 representing 160 and 340 µg in 20 ml of water, respectively. The VAS decreased from 53.5 ± 10.6 to 25.1 ± 9.8 mm (P < 0.01) 0.5 hr following lidocaine administration which continued until the end of evaluation period. In the placebo group, VAS did not change.
Conclusion: Lidocaine diffusion across the tracheostomy tube cuff reduces tube discomfort.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-P. Estebe, M. Gentili, P. Le Corre, G. Dollo, F. Chevanne, and C. Ecoffey Alkalinization of Intracuff Lidocaine: Efficacy and Safety Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1536 - 1541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Estebe, S. Delahaye, P. Le Corre, G. Dollo, A. Le Naoures, F. Chevanne, and C. Ecoffey Alkalinization of intra-cuff lidocaine and use of gel lubrication protect against tracheal tube-induced emergence phenomena Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2004; 92(3): 361 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Estebe, G. Dollo, P. Le Corre, A. Le Naoures, F. Chevanne, R. Le Verge, and C. Ecoffey Alkalinization of Intracuff Lidocaine Improves Endotracheal Tube-Induced Emergence Phenomena Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 227 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Bahk and Y.-J. Lim Use of Intracuff Lidocaine During General Anesthesia Response Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2001; 92(4): 1075 - 1077. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |