Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 44, 629-635, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Propofol or midazolam for sedation and early extubation following cardiac surgery

NR Searle, S Cote, J Taillefer, M Carrier, L Gagnon, M Roy and D Lussier
Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal Heart Institute, Canada.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the efficacy of midazolam and propofol for postoperative sedation and early extubation following cardiac surgery. METHODS: ASA physical status II-III patients scheduled to undergo elective first-time cardiac surgery with an ejection fraction > 45% were eligible. All patients received a standardized sufentanil/isoflurane anaesthesia. During cardiopulmonary bypass 100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 propofol was substituted for isoflurane. Upon arrival in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), patients were randomized to either 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 propofol (n = 21) or 0.25 microgram.kg-1.min-1 midazolam (n = 20). Infusion rates were adjusted to maintain sedation within a predetermined range (Ramsay 2-4). The infusion was terminated after four hours. Patients were weaned from mechanical ventilation and their tracheas extubated when Haemodynamic stability, haemostasis, normothermia and mental orientation were confirmed. Haemodynamic measurements, arterial blood gas tensions and pulmonary function tests were recorded at specified times. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups for the time spent at each level of sedation, number of infusion rate adjustments, amount of analgesic and vasoactive drugs, times to awakening and extubation. The costs of propofol were higher than those of midazolam. There were no differences in haemodynamic values, arterial blood gas tensions and pulmonary function. CONCLUSION: We conclude that midazolam and propofol are safe and effective sedative agents permitting early extubation in this selected cardiac patient population but propofol costs were higher.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Bettex, D. Schmidlin, P.-G. Chassot, and E. R. Schmid Intrathecal sufentanil-morphine shortens the duration of intubation and improves analgesia in fast-track cardiac surgery: [L'administration intrathecale combinee de sufentanil-morphine reduit la duree de l'intubation et ameliore l'analgesie lors d'une intervention cardiaque "fast-track"] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2002; 49(7): 711 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Walder, N. Elia, I. Henzi, J. R. Romand, and M. R. Tramer A Lack of Evidence of Superiority of Propofol Versus Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Qualitative and Quantitative Systematic Review Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2001; 92(4): 975 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Zarate, P. Latham, P. F. White, R. Bossard, L. Morse, L. K. Douning, C. Shi, and L. Chi Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia: Use of Remifentanil Combined with Intrathecal Morphine as an Alternative to Sufentanil During Desflurane Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2000; 91(2): 283 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Ostermann, S. P. Keenan, R. A. Seiferling, and W. J. Sibbald Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review JAMA, March 15, 2000; 283(11): 1451 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]