CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boey, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Dhara, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boey, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Dhara, S. S.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 40, 844-850, Copyright © 1993 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Preoperative plateletpheresis does not reduce blood loss during cardiac surgery

SK Boey, BC Ong and SS Dhara
Department of Anaesthesia, Singapore General Hospital.

Acute preoperative plateletpheresis has been reported to be effective in reducing blood loss and blood component transfusion while improving haematological profiles in patients undergoing open-heart surgery. However, in these studies, the concomitant use of cell saver techniques may have been responsible for the beneficial effects because they remove free haemoglobin and activated procoagulants and, therefore, could mask the deleterious effects of combined plateletpheresis and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In the present study, 40 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization were randomly divided into two groups: a control group without plateletpheresis performed, and a second group in which preoperative platelet-rich plasma 10 ml.kg-1 (PRP group) was collected and later reinfused after reversal of heparin. Standardized surgery, anaesthesia and CPB without concomitant cell saver techniques were employed. In the PRP group, blood transfusion was reduced (1.5 +/- 1.3 vs 2.4 +/- 1.3 units, P < 0.05) but this was accompanied by lower postoperative haemoglobin concentrations. There were no differences in blood loss (992.6 +/- 327.4 vs 889.6 +/- 343.7 ml), fresh frozen plasma (2/19 vs 3/20 patients) or platelet requirements (1/19 vs 1/20 patients). Reinfusion of autologous PRP did not improve platelet count and function, nor tests of coagulation. Fibrinogen concentrations were lower in the PRP group on the operative day (P < 0.05), suggesting increased fibrinogen consumption; and more patients in the PRP group had low haptoglobin levels during CPB (8/19 vs 0/20 patients, P < 0.005), which indicated greater haemolysis in this group. We conclude that acute preoperative plateletpheresis offers no advantage in haemostasis during elective primary myocardial revascularization surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al.
Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. D. Rubens, D. Fergusson, P. S. Wells, M. Huang, J. L. McGowan, and A. Laupacis
Platelet-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of the effect on transfusion requirements
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 1998; 116(4): 641 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.