CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Preston, R.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Preston, R.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, R. D.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 40, 1136-1141, Copyright © 1993 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Maternal positioning affects fetal heart rate changes after epidural analgesia for labour

R Preston, ET Crosby, D Kotarba, H Dudas and RD Elliott
Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa General Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Adverse fetal heart rate (FHR) changes suggestive of fetal hypoxia are seen in patients with normal term pregnancies after initiation of epidural block for labour analgesia. It was our hypothesis that, in some parturients, these changes were a consequence of concealed aortocaval compression resulting in decreased uterine blood flow. We expected that the full lateral position compared with the wedged supine position would provide more effective prophylaxis against aortocaval compression. To test our hypothesis we studied the role of maternal positioning on FHR changes during onset of epidural analgesia for labour. Eighty-eight ASA Class I or II term parturients were randomized into two groups: those to be nursed in the wedged supine position and those to be nursed in the full lateral position during induction of an epidural block. External FHR monitoring was employed to assess the fetal response to initiation of labour epidural analgesia. Epidural catheters were sited with the parturients in the sitting position and the patients then assumed the study position. After a negative test dose, a standardized regimen of bupivacaine 0.25% was employed to provide labour analgesia. The quality and efficacy of the block were assessed using VAS pain scores, motor block scores and sensory levels. The results demonstrated that there was no difference in the quality of analgesia provided nor in the incidence of asymmetric blocks. There was no difference in the observed incidence of FHR changes occurring during the initiation of the epidural block.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. A. Visser, R. A. Lee, and M. J. M. Gielen
Factors Affecting the Distribution of Neural Blockade by Local Anesthetics in Epidural Anesthesia and a Comparison of Lumbar Versus Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 708 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
A. S Thakor and D. A Giussani
Calcitonin gene-related peptide contributes to the umbilical haemodynamic defence response to acute hypoxaemia
J. Physiol., February 15, 2005; 563(1): 309 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Y Beilin, S. Abramovitz, J Zahn, S Enis, and S Hossain
Improved epidural analgesia in the parturient in the 30 degree tilt position
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2000; 47(12): 1176 - 1181.
[Abstract]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.