CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erskine, R.
Right arrow Articles by James, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erskine, R.
Right arrow Articles by James, M. F.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 39, 905-910, Copyright © 1992 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Neutrophils from patients undergoing hip surgery exhibit enhanced movement under spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia

R Erskine, PK Janicki, P Ellis and MF James
Department of Anaesthetics, Medical School, University of Cape Town.

The purpose of this research was to investigate whether the effects of regional anaesthesia on neutrophil migration differ from those due to general anaesthesia during major orthopaedic surgery in human patients. Eighteen patients underwent spinal or general anaesthesia (halothane or isoflurane) for surgery (six patients in each group). Blood samples were taken prior to induction of anaesthesia and after surgery was in progress for one hour. The movement of isolated neutrophils was measured in both samples in the chemotactic chamber toward lipopolysaccharide activated pooled serum. In addition plasma concentrations of catecholamines were determined in the blood samples. Neutrophils extracted from peripheral blood during spinal anaesthesia and surgery moved further towards a complement-derived attractant than neutrophils obtained from patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia with halothane or isoflurane and surgery (156.4 +/- 7.6 microns vs 114.3 +/- 6.1 microns or 119 +/- 8.4 microns respectively, P < 0.05). Increased concentrations of adrenaline were present in both general anaesthetic groups whereas the spinal group had lower concentrations than those prior to anaesthesia and surgery. It is considered unlikely that these differences in neutrophil reactivity are due to the direct effects of anaesthetic agents employed. The effects are likely to be the result of differing effects of spinal anaesthesia on the stress response or immunological mediators.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.