CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 38, 849-858, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Bolus administration of esmolol for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: the Canadian Multicentre Trial

DR Miller, RJ Martineau, JE Wynands and J Hill
Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa General Hospital, Ontario.

A multicentre trial was designed to determine the dose-response and side-effects of esmolol when administered as a single iv bolus prior to induction of anaesthesia for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Five hundred and forty-eight patients from 12 university-affiliated centres across Canada were randomized prospectively to receive either placebo (PLAC) or esmolol (E) in a dose of 100 mg (E100) or 200 mg (E200). Study medication was given immediately before induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone 3-5 mg.kg-1 and succinylcholine 1.5 mg.kg-1. Low-dose narcotic (fentanyl 2-3 micrograms.kg-1 or sufentanil 0.3 micrograms.kg-1) or moderate dose narcotic (fentanyl 4-7 micrograms.kg-1) was also given at five of the participating centres, whereas patients in the remaining seven centres received no narcotic. Patients who received PLAC and no narcotic had greater HR and SBP values after tracheal intubation than patients who received either E100 or E200 (P less than 0.005). The proportion of patients whose maximum HR exceeded 110 min-1 was also greater in the PLAC group (22/180) than in either the E100 (10/187) or E200 (9/181) groups (P less than 0.05), but was not different when comparing E100 with E200. Esmolol was less effective in controlling blood pressure, but, in combination with low-dose narcotic, esmolol suppressed the SBP response to tracheal intubation. In the presence of moderate-dose narcotic, however, a decrease in SBP occurred in all three groups following induction of anaesthesia (P less than 0.003), with the largest decrease (17 +/- 4%) occurring in patients who had received E200. The overall incidence of hypotension (SBP less than 90 mmHg) was greater in the E200 group (33%) than either the E100 (25%) or PLAC (16%) groups (P less than 0.05). Other side-effects, such as bradycardia, bronchospasm or pain on injection, occurred no more frequently in either esmolol group than with placebo. It is concluded that a 100 mg bolus of esmolol is safe and effective for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. This dose of esmolol combined with a low dose of narcotic (fentanyl 2-3 micrograms.kg-1 or equivalent) results in effective control of both heart rate and blood pressure, while avoiding important side-effects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Ozturk, H. Kaya, G. Aran, M. Aksun, and S. Savaci
Postoperative beneficial effects of esmolol in treated hypertensive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 211 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): e159 - e242.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e418 - e500.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
H. Zhao, T. Sugawara, S. Miura, T. Iijima, and S. Kashimoto
Intrathecal landiolol inhibits nociception and spinal c-Fos expression in the mouse formalin test: [Le landiolol intrathecal inhibe la nociception ainsi que l'expression rachidienne de c-Fos lors du test de formaline chez la souris]
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2007; 54(3): 201 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guideline Update on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery: Focused Update on Perioperative Beta-Blocker Therapy -- A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2007; 104(1): 15 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Wiesbauer, O. Schlager, H. Domanovits, B. Wildner, G. Maurer, M. Muellner, H. Blessberger, and M. Schillinger
Perioperative {beta}-Blockers for Preventing Surgery-Related Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2007; 104(1): 27 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guideline Update on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery: Focused Update on Perioperative Beta-Blocker Therapy: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2343 - 2355.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P J Devereaux, W S. Beattie, P. T-L Choi, N. H Badner, G. H Guyatt, J. C Villar, C. S Cina, K. Leslie, M. J Jacka, V. M Montori, et al.
How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative {beta} blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BMJ, August 6, 2005; 331(7512): 313 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. Y. Chia, M. H. Chan, N. H. Ko, and K. Liu
Role of {beta}-blockade in anaesthesia and postoperative pain management after hysterectomy
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2004; 93(6): 799 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Menigaux, B. Guignard, F. Adam, D. I. Sessler, V. Joly, and M. Chauvin
Esmolol prevents movement and attenuates the BIS response to orotracheal intubation{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2002; 89(6): 857 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Zaugg, M. C. Schaub, T. Pasch, and D. R. Spahn
Modulation of {beta}-adrenergic receptor subtype activities in perioperative medicine: mechanisms and sites of action
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2002; 88(1): 101 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. W. Johansen
Esmolol Promotes Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression During Propofol/Alfentanil Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1526 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. L. Atlee, M. S. Dhamee, T. L. Olund, and V. George
The Use of Esmolol, Nicardipine, or Their Combination to Blunt Hemodynamic Changes After Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2000; 90(2): 280 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. B. Wiest, S. S. Garner, W. E. Uber, and R. M. Sade
Esmolol for the management of pediatric hypertension after cardiac operations
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 1998; 115(4): 890 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.