CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suderman, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lui, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suderman, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lui, A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 38, 785-789, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Elective oral tracheal intubation in cervical spine-injured adults

VS Suderman, ET Crosby and A Lui
Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

There is controversy regarding the optimal mode of elective tracheal intubation in the patient with an unstable cervical spine following trauma. A ten-year review of 150 patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries with well-preserved neurological function, presenting for operative stabilization, was conducted to compare neurological outcome with the mode of tracheal intubation. Preoperative neurological deficits were identified in 49 patients (33%); most were single-level radiculopathies. Intubation occurred after induction of general anaesthesia in 83 patients (55%) and in 67 patients (45%) the tracheas were intubated with the patient awake. One hundred and six patients (71%) underwent oral tracheal intubation and 44 underwent nasal tracheal intubation. Ten intubations were deemed to be difficult requiring more than one attempt to effect intubation. Cervical spine immobilization during intubation was documented in 86 patients (57%). Weighted traction or manual in-line traction were the two manoeuvres most commonly employed to maintain spinal alignment during intubation. After surgery, two patients had new neurological deficits. There were no differences in neurological outcome whether intubation was performed while the patient was awake or under general anaesthesia, or comparing oral tracheal intubation with all other techniques (P = 0.5, Fisher exact test). Also, in-line traction did not affect neurological outcome. Oral tracheal intubation with in-line stabilization, either performed after induction of general anaesthesia or with the patient awake, remains an excellent option for elective airway management in patients with cervical spine injuries.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
J. M. Walz, M. Zayaruzny, and S. O. Heard
Airway Management in Critical Illness
Chest, February 1, 2007; 131(2): 608 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 TraumaHome page
C. Gwinnutt, L. Bethelmy, and J. Nolan
Anaesthesia in trauma
Trauma, January 1, 2003; 5(1): 51 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Inoue, K. Koga, and A. Shigematsu
A Comparison of Two Tracheal Intubation Techniques with TrachlightTM and FastrachTM in Patients with Cervical Spine Disorders
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 667 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
B. W. Chiles and P. R. Cooper
Acute Spinal Injury
N. Engl. J. Med., February 22, 1996; 334(8): 514 - 520.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.