CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dull, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tinker, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dull, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tinker, J. H.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 38, 213-216, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Efficacy of prior skin puncture in preventing i.v. catheter damage

DL Dull, RB Forbes and JH Tinker
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.

The efficacy, with respect to preventing i.v. catheter damage, of creating a skin entry site by first piercing the skin with a large gauge needle through which an over-the-needle teflon catheter is then placed was evaluated. In 50 adult volunteers two 22-gauge i.v. catheters and two 24-gauge catheters were placed through the forearm skin into the subcutaneous tissue. One catheter of each size was placed through an entry site created by piercing the skin with an 18-gauge disposable, stainless steel needle. One catheter of each size was inserted through nearby skin without creation of an entry site. Two to three weeks after insertion all catheters, along with 50 catheters of each size that had not been inserted, were examined under a microscope for evidence of damage. Intravenous catheter damage was more prevalent in the 24-gauge catheters than the 22-gauge catheters (P less than 0.05). No differences in frequency of damage were noted for either gauge catheter inserted through an entry site compared with those inserted without a prior skin puncture. Twenty-four-gauge catheters, but not 22-gauge catheters, placed into the subcutaneous tissue were damaged more frequently than were catheters that had never been inserted (control catheters). This study demonstrated that 24-gauge catheters are more likely to be damaged during insertion into the subcutaneous tissue than are 22-gauge catheters. We also demonstrated that creation of a skin entry site by piercing the epidermis with a needle of larger gauge than the catheter to be placed is not efficacious in preventing intravenous catheter damage during insertion.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.