CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brull, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brull, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, D. G.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 38, 164-168, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Assessment of residual curarization using low-current stimulation

SJ Brull, J Ehrenwerth, NR Connelly and DG Silverman
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510.

The present study employed train-of-four (TOF) stimulation at a current of 20 mA to assess the incidence and degree of residual neuromuscular blockade in 64 randomly selected Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) patients. Group C (Control, n = 10) had received anaesthesia without nondepolarizing muscle relaxant; Group V (n = 25) had received vecuronium; and Group P (n = 29) had received pancuronium. At the end of surgery, each patient had been considered by his anaesthetist to have adequate neuromuscular function on the basis of clinical signs and tactile or visual evaluation of responses to TOF stimulation. However, upon testing in the PACU 15 min later, 45% (13 of 29) of Group P patients and 8% (2 of 25) of Group V patients had a TOF ration less than 0.70. This study indicates that residual curarization may be commonly encountered following long-acting relaxants despite qualitative intraoperative TOF monitoring. The present incidence, detected at a current of 20 mA, is consistent with previous reports which employed supramaximal TOF stimulation. We conclude that despite intraoperative monitoring, residual curarization following long-acting nondepolarizing agents is common and that it may be detected with TOF at a low stimulating current (20 mA).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Naguib, A. F. Kopman, and J. E. Ensor
Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 302 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Baillard, S. Bourdiau, P. Le Toumelin, F. Ait Kaci, B. Riou, M. Cupa, and C. M. Samama
Assessing Residual Neuromuscular Blockade Using Acceleromyography Can Be Deceptive in Postoperative Awake Patients
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 854 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. S. Kim, S. H. Lew, H. Y. Cho, and M. A. Cheong
Residual Paralysis Induced by Either Vecuronium or Rocuronium After Reversal with Pyridostigmine
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1656 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.