| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 37, 726-731, Copyright © 1990 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
ARTICLES |
TJ Wasylak, FV Abbott, MJ English and ME Jeans
School of Nursing, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
The present study examined the impact of two methods of pain management on recovery in 38 women undergoing hysterectomy. One group received IV morphine in the recovery room and IM morphine on the ward on a PRN basis (PRN group). In the other group, a loading dose of morphine 8 mg IV was given when the patient first complained of pain and patient-controlled IV morphine (PCA) was initiated and continued for 48 h (PCA group). Both groups received similar amounts of morphine overall, differently distributed over time. The PCA patients received 8 mg.h-1 in the recovery room (approximately 2.5 hrs) and less thereafter. The PRN patients received approximately 2 mg.h-1 for the entire 48-hr period. Pain control was better throughout convalescence and less variable across time with PCA management. Minute ventilation also recovered faster and by day four was 25 per cent above the preoperative baseline in the PCA group. In addition, oral temperature became normal one day earlier, ambulation recovered more rapidly and patients were discharged from hospital earlier. The data suggest that early treatment with relatively high, self-titrated morphine doses may alter the course of the metabolic response to surgery.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Castro, U. Tharmaratnam, N. Brockhurst, L. Tureanu, K. Tam, and R. Windrim Patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl provides effective analgesia for second trimester labour: a randomized controlled study: [L'analgesie auto-controlee avec du fentanyl est efficace pendant le travail obstetrical du second trimestre : une etude randomisee et controlee] Can J Anesth, December 1, 2003; 50(10): 1039 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Cook and G. A. Rooke Priorities in Perioperative Geriatrics Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1823 - 1836. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Boisseau, O. Rabary, B. Padovani, P. Staccini, J. Mouroux, D. Grimaud, and M. Raucoules-Aime Improvement of 'dynamic analgesia' does not decrease atelectasis after thoracotomy Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2001; 87(4): 564 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Rudolph, J. F. Cade, P. T. Morley, J. S. Packer, and B. Lee Smart Technology Improves Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Preliminary Report Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1226 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Datta and S. Jain Pain Management Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1997; 1(3): 264 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Tobias and D. K. Baker Patient-Controlled Analgesia With Fentanyl in Children Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 1992; 31(3): 177 - 179. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |