CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chi, O.
Right arrow Articles by Jasaitis, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chi, O.
Right arrow Articles by Jasaitis, D

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 37, 452-456, Copyright © 1990 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Visual evoked potentials during etomidate administration in humans

OZ Chi, J Subramoni and D Jasaitis
Department of Anesthesia, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School-Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick 08903-0019.

The effects of etomidate on visual evoked potentials (VEP) were studied in 22 patients undergoing gynaecological procedures. They were divided into two groups: the etomidate group (12 patients) and the fentanyl-N2O-etomidate group (ten patients). In the etomidate group, etomidate 0.3 mg.kg-1 was given as a bolus injection during induction of anaesthesia which was followed by an infusion of etomidate 0.05 mg.kg-1.min-1. No significant changes were observed in the amplitudes of P100 or N70. Latencies of the P60, N70, and P100 were slightly increased. In the fentanyl-N2O-etomidate group, a bolus injection of 0.3 mg.kg-1 of etomidate was given during anaesthesia with 3-4 micrograms.kg-1 of fentanyl and 60 per cent nitrous oxide. The amplitude of the P100 was significantly decreased and the latencies of the P60 and N70 were significantly increased. In conclusion, interpretation of the VEP during etomidate administration alone was not hard to perform but, when given together with fentanyl-nitrous oxide anaesthesia, the VEP was affected significantly making its interpretation difficult.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.