CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trepanier, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Denault, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trepanier, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Denault, P. H.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 37, 156-159, Copyright © 1990 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Risk of cross-infection related to the multiple use of disposable syringes

CA Trepanier, MR Lessard, JG Brochu and PH Denault
Departement d'Anesthesie, Hopital de l'Enfant-Jesus, Universite Laval, Quebec.

The rate of blood contamination of IV tubings used in anaesthesia practice was investigated. Only IV tubings started in the operating room were studied. First, 300 tubings of three different types were tested at the three distal injection sites. The contamination rate was 3.3 per cent at the injection site closest to the IV catheter and 0.3 per cent at the furthest. The presence of a check-valve did not affect the contamination rate. Second, 300 third injection sites fixed at a level equal to or above the IV catheter were tested. None of them was contaminated. Finally, in order to evaluate whether changing the needle alone could prevent the contamination of syringes, injections were made into a tubing where blood was flowing. Thirty-four per cent of the syringes tested positive for blood. We conclude that IV tubings have a significant contamination rate in usual practice. This rate decreases as the distance from the IV catheter increases. The use of the third site fixed at a level equal to or above the IV catheter carries a lower risk of contamination. Changing the needle alone is a useless procedure to prevent cross-contamination.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C. A. Trepanier and M. R. Lessard
Propofol and the risk of transmission of infection/Le propofol et le risque de transmission d'infection
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2003; 50(6): 533 - 537.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
D.S Luijt, J Schirm, P.H.M Savelkoul, and A Hoekstra
Risk of infection by reprocessed and resterilized virus-contaminated catheters; an in-vitro study
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2001; 22(5): 378 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
R. A. Kozarek, J.-P. Bronowicki, and M.-A. Bigard
Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus during Colonoscopy
N. Engl. J. Med., December 18, 1997; 337(25): 1848 - 1849.
[Full Text]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
J.-P. Bronowicki, V. Venard, C. Botte, N. Monhoven, I. Gastin, L. Chone, H. Hudziak, B. Rhin, C. Delanoe, A. LeFaou, et al.
Patient-to-Patient Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus during Colonoscopy
N. Engl. J. Med., July 24, 1997; 337(4): 237 - 240.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
S. N. Bennett, M. M. McNeil, L. A. Bland, M. J. Arduino, M. E. Villarino, D. M. Perrotta, D. R. Burwen, S. F. Welbel, D. A. Pegues, L. Stroud, et al.
Postoperative Infections Traced to Contamination of an Intravenous Anesthetic, Propofol
N. Engl. J. Med., July 20, 1995; 333(3): 147 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.