CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RIGG, J.R. A.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDSMITH, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by RIGG, J.R. A.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDSMITH, C. H.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 23, 370-382, Copyright © 1976 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

Recovery of Ventilatory Response to Carbon Dioxide after Thiopentone, Morphine and Fentanyl in Man

J.R. A. RIGG 1 and C. H. GOLDSMITH 1

1 Departments of Anaesthesia and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4J9

Ventilatory responses to CO2 ({Delta}V·I/{Delta}PCOCO2) were measured half, one, two, and four hours after infusions of thiopentone, morphine, fentanyl and saline in healthy men in order to test the idea that variation in clinical recovery and control of breathing after anaesthetic drugs are associated with interindividual differences in control measurements of {Delta}V·I/{Delta}PCOCO2. Ventilatory response to CO2 was profoundly reduced one half hour after each drug, in contrast to the observation during air breathing that ventilation and end tidal PCOCO2 had returned to within 10 per cent of control. Mean {Delta}V·I/{Delta}PCOCO2 increased progressively at one, two, and four hours, returning to near control after thiopentone, but remaining less than 80 per cent of control four hours after morphine and fentanyl. From the regression equations of each ventilatory response, ventilation at PCOCO2 of 58 and 70 mmHg (V·II58 and V·II70) were computed to estimate displacement of the response curves by the drugs. Following thiopentone there was no significant change of V·II58. In contrast there was a highly significant fall of V·II58 one half hour after fentanyl (p < 0.01), with progressive return towards control at one, two, and four hours; similar changes were observed after morphine. For each drug, changes of V·II70 were substantially greater than corresponding changes of V·II58. At all times during these recovery measurements, subjects were conscious and co-operative and, by traditional clinical criteria, were judged to have recovered from the effects of the drugs. Differences between high and low responding subjects were assessed by plotting control measurements against values obtained half and one hour after drugs. No systematic differences were found. These findings suggest that {Delta}V·I/{Delta}PCOCO2 is a sensitive indicator of central nervous activity, but do not support the concepts that individuals with low {Delta}V·I/{Delta}PCOCO2 might be more susceptible to the ventilatory depressant effects of anaesthetic drugs, or that low {Delta}V·I/{Delta}PCOCO2 might be associated with delayed return of spontaneous breathing after general anaesthesia. Plasma thiopentone levels at half, one, and four hours were highly reproducible, in contrast to the wide variation of {Delta}V·I/{Delta}PCOCO2 among subjects in this study. These findings together support the notion that wide variation in clinical recovery from anaesthesia may have a primary physiological basis in addition to variation caused by interindividual differences in drug dosage, biotransformation and excretion.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.